Список литературы

1. Choe JM. Paraphimosis: current treatment options. Am Fam Physician. 2000; 62(12): 2623 - 2626, 2628.

2. Скорая медицинская помощь: национальное руоковдство. 2-е изд./Под ред. С.Ф. Багненко, С.С. Петрикова, И.П. Минуллина, А.Г. Мирошниченко. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2025. 1032 с.

3. Урология: национальное руководство/под ред. Н.А. Лопаткина. - М.; ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2013. - 1024 с.

4. McPhee AS, Stormont G, McKay AC. Phimosis. 2023 Aug 8. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.10.14.

5. Chan IH, Wong KK. Common urological problems in children: prepuce, phimosis, and buried penis. Hong Kong Med J. 2016; 22(3): 263 - 269. doi: 10.12809/hkmj154645.

6. Perkins OS, Leslie SW, Cortes S. Balanoposthitis. 2024 May 6. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.

7. Nguyen ATM, Holland AJA. Balanitis xerotica obliterans: an update for clinicians. Eur J Pediatr. 2020; 179(1): 9 - 16. doi: 10.1007/s00431-019-03516-3.

8. Charlton OA, Smith SD. Balanitis xerotica obliterans: a review of diagnosis and management. Int J Dermatol. 2019 Jul; 58(7): 777 - 781. doi: 10.1111/ijd.14236.

9. Bromage S.J., Crump A., Pearce I. Phimosis as a presenting feature of diabetes. BJU Int. 2008; 101(3): 338 - 340. Doi: 10.1111/j.1464410X.2007.07274.x.

10. Bromage SJ, Crump A, Pearce I. Phimosis as a presenting feature of diabetes. BJU Int. 2008 Feb; 101(3): 338 - 40. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07274.x. Epub 2007 Nov 13. PMID: 18005214.

11. Forouhi N.G., Merrick D., Goyder E., Ferguson B.A., Abbas J, Lachowycz K., Wild S.H. Diabetes prevalence in England, 2001 - estimates from an epidemiological model. Diabet Med. 2006; 23(2): 189 - 197. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01787.x.

12. Ljungberg C, , Vandenbroucke-Grauls C, Jakobsen JK, Charles MH, , Dalager-Pedersen M, , Thomsen RW. Risk of Phimosis Associated With SGLT2i Versus GLP-1RA: A Danish Cohort Study. Diabetes Care. 2025; 48(10): 1774 - 1782. doi: 10.2337/dc25-0693.

13. Gardiner D. The fate of the foreskin, a study of circumcision. Br Med J. 1949; 2(4642): 1433 - 1437, illust. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4642.1433.

14. Oster J. Further fate of the foreskin. Incidence of preputial adhesions, phimosis, and smegma among Danish schoolboys. Arch Dis Child. 1968; 43(228): 200 - 203. doi: 10.1136/adc.43.228.2003.

15. Morris BJ, Matthews JG, Krieger JN. Prevalence of Phimosis in Males of All Ages: Systematic Review. Urology. 2020; 135: 124 - 132. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.10.003.

16. Grutman AJ, Gabrielson AT. Paraphimosis: An Epidemiological Perspective From a Large Multicenter Research Network. Urol Pract. 2025; 12(5): 489 - 491. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000824.

17. Meuli M., Briner J., Hanimann B., Sacher P. Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus causing phimosis in boys: a prospective study with 5-year followup after complete circumcision. J Urol. 1994; 152(3): 9878 - 9879. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17) 32638-1.

18. Kikiros C.S., Beasley S.W. Woodward A.A. The response of phimosis to local steroid application. Pediatr Surg Int. 1993; 8: 329 - 332. doi: org/10.1007/BF00173357.

19. Ахвледиани Н.Д., Садченко А.В., Прилепская Е.А., Смерницкий А.М., Пушкарь Д.Ю. Функциональный фимоз: распространенность, особенности диагностики и лечения в амбулаторной практике. Урология 2022; (5): 54 - 58 doi: 10.18565/urology.2022.5.54-58.

20. Hayashi Y, Kojima Y, Mizuno K, Kohri K. Prepuce: phimosis, paraphimosis, and circumcision. Scientific World Journal. 2011; 11: 289 - 301. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2011.31.

21. McPhee AS, Stormont G, McKay AC. Phimosis. 2023 Aug 8. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. PMID: 30247847.

22. Tomita K, Kakizawa Y, Yoshida M. [A case of true phimosis with bilateral hydroureteronephrosis and bilateral vesicoureteral reflux]. Hinyokika Kiyo. 1991; 37(3): 283 - 285.

23. Sancaktutar AA, , Atar M, , , Bozkurt Y, Tepeler A. Severe phimosis leading to obstructive uropathy in a boy with lichen sclerosus. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2012; 46(5): 371 - 374. doi: 10.3109/00365599.2012.689007.

24. Шарипов Ф. Национальные клинические протоколы по нозологии "Фимоз и парафимоз"/под ред. 1-е изд. Ташкент - 2024. - 39 с.

25. Carilli M, Asimakopoulos AD, Pastore S, Germani S, Orecchia L, , Miano R. Can circumcision be avoided in adult male with phimosis? Results of the PhimoStop^TM prospective trial. Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Nov; 10(11): 4152 - 4160. doi: 10.21037/tau-21-673. PMID: 34984181; PMCID: PMC8661253.

26. Rosato E, Miano R, Germani S, Asimakopoulos AD. Phimosis in Adults: Narrative Review of the New Available Devices and the Standard Treatments. Clin Pract. 2024 Feb 18; 14(1): 361 - 376. doi: 10.3390/clinpract14010028.

27. Lygas A, Joshi HB. An evaluation of the pharmacotherapeutic options for the treatment of adult phimosis. A systematic review of the evidence. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2022 Jun; 23(9): 1115 - 1122. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2075697.

28. Ghysel C, Vander Eeckt K, Bogaert GA. Long-term efficiency of skin stretching and a topical corticoid cream application for unretractable foreskin and phimosis in prepubertal boys. Urol Int. 2009; 82(1): 81 - 88. doi: 10.1159/000176031.

29. Turner CD, Kim HL, Cromie WJ. Dorsal band traction for reduction of paraphimosis. Urology. 1999; 54(5): 917 - 918. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99) 00320 - 9.

30. Houghton GR. The "iced-glove" method of treatment of paraphimosis. Br J Surg. 1973; 60(11): 876 - 877. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800601110.

31. Kerwat R, Shandall A, Stephenson B. Reduction of paraphimosis with granulated sugar. Br J Urol. 1998; 82(5): 755. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00902.x.

32. , Sousa MA, Parra Muntaner L, Pacios JC. : tratamiento de en la parafimosis irreductible [Sugar: treatment of choice in irreducible paraphimosis]. Actas Urol Esp. 2001; 25(5): 393 - 395. Spanish. doi: 10.1016/s0210-4806(01) 72638-1.

33. Anand A, Kapoor S. Mannitol for paraphimosis reduction. Urol Int. 2013; 90(1): 106 - 108. doi: 10.1159/000343737.

34. Reynard JM, Barua J.M Reduction of paraphimosis the simple ways - the Dundee Technique. BJU Int. 1999; 83: 859 - 860.

35. Kumar V, Javle P. Modified puncture technique for reduction of paraphymosis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2001; 83(2): 126 - 127.

36. Shabanzadeh DM, Clausen S, Maigaard K, Fode M. Male Circumcision Complications - A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression. Urology. 2021; 152: 25 - 34. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.01.041.

37. Totaro A, Volpe A, Racioppi M, Pinto F, Sacco E, Bassi PF. La circoncisione tra storia, religione e giurisdizione [Circumcision: history, religion and law]. Urologia. 2011; 78(1): 1 - 9. Italian. doi: 10.5301/ru.2011.6433.

38. Han H, Xie DW, Zhou XG, Zhang XD. Novel penile circumcision suturing devices versus the shang ring for adult male circumcision: a prospective study. Int Braz J Urol. 2017; 43(4): 736 - 745. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.020.

39. Xu Y, Li F, Li Z, Guan W, Wu Y, Ouyang Y, Zhao Y, Liu C. A prospective, randomized controlled trial of circumcision in adult males using the CO2 laser: modified technique compared with the conventional dorsal-slit technique. Photomed Laser Surg. 2013; 31(9): 422 - 427. doi: 10.1089/pho.2013.3550.

40. Scarcella S, Law YXT, Bravi CA, Piazza P, Heldwein FL, Ronchi P, Lacetera V, Beatrici V, Gauhar V, Castellani D. Does using a laser improve outcomes of conventional circumcision in adult and children populations? Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Andrology. 2023; 11(1): 54 - 64. doi: 10.1111/andr.13321.

41. Котов С.В., Павлов И.С., Корочкин Н.Д., Алекберов Э.М. Аппаратное обрезание крайней плоти: преимущества, выбор устройства и хирургическая техника. Вестник урологии. 2024; 12(4): 114 - 120. doi: 10.21886/2308-6424-2024-12-4-114-120.

42. Peng YF, Cheng Y, Wang GY, Wang SQ, Jia C, Yang BH, Zhu R, Jian SC, Li QW, Geng DW. Clinical application of a new device for minimally invasive circumcision. Asian J Androl. 2008; 10(3): 447 - 454. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7262.2008.00411.x.

43. Hohlfeld A, Ebrahim S, Shaik MZ, Kredo T. Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 3(3): CD012250. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012250.pub2.

44. , , Erbin A. Comparison of ring instruments and classic circumcision methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arab J Urol. 2022; 20(3): 144 - 158. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2022.2071545.

45. Fan Y, Cao D, Wei Q, Tang Z, Tan P, Yang L, Liu L, Liu Z, Li X, Xue W. The characteristics of circular disposable devices and in situ devices for optimizing male circumcision: a network meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016; 6: 25514. doi: 10.1038/srep2551.

46. Huang YC, Huang YK, Chen CS, Shindel AW, Wu CF, Lin JH, Chiu KH, Yang TH, Shi CS. Phimosis with Preputial Fissures as a Predictor of Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes in Adults. Acta Derm Venereol. 2016 Mar; 96(3): 377 - 80. doi: 10.2340/00015555-2244. PMID: 26349852.

47. Shah VS, Jung NL, Lee DK, Nepple KG. Does Routine Pathology Analysis of Adult Circumcision Tissue Identify Penile Cancer? Urology. 2015 Jun; 85(6): 1431 - 1434. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.12.065. Epub 2015 Apr 11. PMID: 25872693; PMCID: PMC5018204.