Список литературы

0

Критерии качества

Уровень убедительности рекомендаций

Уровень достоверности доказательств

1

Проведено ультразвуковое исследование плода с верификацией вида предлежания плода

C

5

КонсультантПлюс: примечание.

Нумерация пунктов дана в соответствии с официальным текстом документа.

3

Предоставлена информация пациентке о возможных рисках и методе родоразрешения

C

5

4

При отсутствии противопоказаний предложен наружный поворот плода на головку

A

1

5

Перед плановым кесаревым сечением проведено ультразвуковое исследование плода или использованы наружные приемы для определения положения и предлежания плода

C

5

6

Выполнен непрерывный КТГ-мониторинг в родах

B

3

7

Выполнен контроль прогресса родов с использованием партограммы

C

5

Список литературы

1. Hofmeyr G.J. Overview of breech presentation. Literature review current through: Feb 2020 | This topic last updated: Dec 16, 2019. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-breech-presentation.

2. 00000005.wmz S., 00000006.wmz M., Radeka G., 00000007.wmz A., 00000008.wmz S., Podgorac J., et al. Breech presentation and the cornual-fundal location of the placenta. Croat Med J. 2013; 54(2): 198 - 202.

3. Mostello D., Chang J.J., Bai F., Wang J., Guild C., Stamps K., et al. Breech presentation at delivery: a marker for congenital anomaly? J Perinatol. 2014; 34(1): 11 - 5.

4. Fruscalzo A., Londero A.P., Salvador S., Bertozzi S., Biasioli A., Della Martina M., et al. New and old predictive factors for breech presentation: our experience in 14 433 singleton pregnancies and a literature review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014; 27(2): 167 - 72.

5. Акушерство: национальное руководство/под ред. Г.М. Савельевой, Г.Т. Сухих, В.Н. Серова, В.Е. Радзинского. - 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа; 2018. 1088 p.

6. Management of Breech Presentation: Green-top Guideline No. 20b. BJOG. 2017; 124(7): e151 - 77.

7. Breech Presentation, External Cephalic Version (ECV) and Breech Presentation in Labour Clinical Guideline V2.1. 2019. 13 p.

8. Department for Health and Ageing, Government of South Australia. Breech Presentation. South Australian Perinatal Practice Guideline. - 2018. - 13 p.

9. Kotaska A., Menticoglou S. No. 384-Management of Breech Presentation at Term. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019; 41(8): 1193 - 205.

10. Breech Presentation and Delivery. SOGC Obstetrical Content Review committee, 2012.

11. Hofmeyr GJ. Abnormal fetal presentation and position. In: Chapter 34, Turnbull's Obstetrics, 2000.

12. Hofmeyr G.J. Delivery of the singleton fetus in breech presentation. Literature review current through: Feb 2020. | This topic last updated: Feb 24, 2020. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/delivery-of-the-singleton-fetus-in-breech-presentation.

13. J. Payne. Breech Presentations/EMIS Group pic UK. - 2016.

14. Guidelines For The Management of Breech Presentation Including External Cephalic Version (ECV). NHS; 2014. 23 p.

15. External Cephalic Version and Reducing the Incidence of Term Breech Presentation: Green-top Guideline No. 20a. BJOG. 2017; 124(7): e178 - 92.

16. Gynaecology. K.E.M.H.O.&. Clinical practice guideline: Abnormalities of Lie/Presentation. 2018. 24 p.

17. Hofmeyr G.J., Kulier R., West H.M. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2015; (4): CD000083.

18. Hutton E.K., Hannah M.E., Ross S.J., Delisle M.-F., Carson G.D., Windrim R., et al. The Early External Cephalic Version (ECV) 2 Trial: an international multicentre randomised controlled trial of timing of ECV for breech pregnancies. BJOG. 2011; 118(5): 564 - 77.

19. Hutton E.K., Hofmeyr G.J., Dowswell T. External cephalic version for breech presentation before term. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2015; (7): CD000084.

20. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Practice Bulletins--Obstetrics. Practice Bulletin No. 161: External Cephalic Version. Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 127(2): e54 - 61.

21. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 745: Mode of Term Singleton Breech Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 132(2): e60 - 3.

22. Thissen D., Swinkels P., Dullemond R.C., van der Steeg J.W. Introduction of a dedicated team increases the success rate of external cephalic version: A prospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019; 236: 193 - 7.

23. Goffinet F., Carayol M., Foidart J.-M., Alexander S., Uzan S., Subtil D., et al. Is planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term still an option? Results of an observational prospective survey in France and Belgium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194(4): 1002 - 11.

24. Azria E., Le Meaux J.-P., Khoshnood B., Alexander S., Subtil D., Goffinet F., et al. Factors associated with adverse perinatal outcomes for term breech fetuses with planned vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 207(4): 285. e1 - 9.

25. Glezerman M. Five years to the term breech trial: the rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194(1): 20 - 5.

26. Menticoglou S.M. Why vaginal breech delivery should still be offered. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006; 28(5): 380 - 5; discussion 386 - 9.

27. Whyte H., Hannah M.E., Saigal S., Hannah W.J., Hewson S., Amankwah K., et al. Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191(3): 864 - 71.

28. Negele K., Heinrich J., Borte M., von Berg A., Schaaf B., Lehmann I., et al. Mode of delivery and development of atopic disease during the first 2 years of life. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2004; 15(1): 48 - 54.

29. Laubereau B., Filipiak-Pittroff B., von Berg A., 00000009.wmz A., Reinhardt D., Wichmann H.E., et al. Caesarean section and gastrointestinal symptoms, atopic dermatitis, and sensitisation during the first year of life. Arch Dis Child. 2004; 89(11): 993 - 7.

30. Hull A.D., Moore T.R. Multiple repeat cesareans and the threat of placenta accreta: incidence, diagnosis, management. Clin Perinatol. 2011; 38(2): 285 - 96.

31. Schutte J.M., Steegers E.A.P., Santema J.G., Schuitemaker N.W.E., van Roosmalen J., Maternal Mortality Committee Of The Netherlands Society Of Obstetrics. Maternal deaths after elective cesarean section for breech presentation in the Netherlands. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007; 86(2): 240 - 3.

32. Lawson G.W. Report of a breech cesarean section maternal death. Birth. 2011; 38(2): 159 - 61.

33. Ismail M.A., Nagib N., Ismail T., Cibils L.A. Comparison of vaginal and cesarean section delivery for fetuses in breech presentation. J Perinat Med. 1999; 27(5): 339 - 51.

34. Bergenhenegouwen L., Vlemmix F., Ensing S., Schaaf J., van der Post J., Abu-Hanna A., et al. Preterm Breech Presentation: A Comparison of Intended Vaginal and Intended Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126(6): 1223 - 30.

35. Robilio P.A., Boe N.M., Danielsen B., Gilbert W.M. Vaginal vs. cesarean delivery for preterm breech presentation of singleton infants in California: a population-based study. J Reprod Med. 2007; 52(6): 473 - 9.

36. Flamm B.L., Fried M.W., Lonky N.M., Giles W.S. External cephalic version after previous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 165(2): 370 - 2.

37. Hofmeyr G.J., Hannah M., Lawrie T.A. Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2015; (7): CD000166.

38. Hannah M.E., Hannah W.J., Hewson S.A., Hodnett E.D., Saigal S., Willan A.R. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet (London, England). 2000; 356(9239): 1375 - 83.

39. Hehir M.P. Trends in vaginal breech delivery. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015; 69(12): 1237 - 9.

40. Vendittelli F., Pons J.C., Lemery D., Mamelle N., Obstetricians of the AUDIPOG Sentinel Network. The term breech presentation: Neonatal results and obstetric practices in France. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006; 125(2): 176 - 84.

41. Kotaska A., Menticoglou S., Gagnon R., MATERNAL FETAL MEDICINE COMMITTEE. Vaginal delivery of breech presentation. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009; 31(6): 557 - 66.

42. Michel S., Drain A., Closset E., Deruelle P., Ego A., Subtil D., et al. Evaluation of a decision protocol for type of delivery of infants in breech presentation at term. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011; 158(2): 194 - 8.

43. Hofmeyr G.J., Kulier R., West H.M. Expedited versus conservative approaches for vaginal delivery in breech presentation. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2015; (7): CD000082.

44. Jennewein L., Kielland-Kaisen U., Paul B., 00000010.wmz C.J., Klemt A.-S., Schulze S., et al. Maternal and neonatal outcome after vaginal breech delivery at term of children weighing more or less than 3.8 kg: A FRABAT prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2018; 13(8): e0202760.

45. Bogner G., Strobl M., Schausberger C., Fischer T., Reisenberger K., Jacobs V.R. Breech delivery in the all fours position: a prospective observational comparative study with classic assistance. J Perinat Med. 2015; 43(6): 707 - 13.

46. Reitter A., Daviss B.-A., Bisits A., Schollenberger A., Vogl T., Herrmann E., et al. Does pregnancy and/or shifting positions create more room in a woman's pelvis? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 211(6): 662. e1 - 9.

47. Jettestad M.C., 00000011.wmz H.A., Yli B.M., Kessler J. Fetal monitoring in term breech labor - A review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019; 239: 45 - 51.

48. Kessler J., Moster D., Albrechtsen S. Intrapartum monitoring with cardiotocography and ST-waveform analysis in breech presentation: an observational study. BJOG. 2015; 122(4): 528 - 35.

49. Hodnett E.D., Gates S., Hofmeyr G.J., Sakala C. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2013; 7: CD003766.

50. Jones L., Othman M., Dowswell T., Alfirevic Z., Gates S., Newburn M., et al. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2012; (3): CD009234.

51. Bleu G., Demetz J., Michel S., Drain A., Houfflin-Debarge V., Deruelle P., et al. Effectiveness and safety of induction of labor for term breech presentations. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017; 46(1): 29 - 34.

52. Macharey G., Ulander V.-M., Heinonen S., Kostev K., Nuutila M., 00000012.wmz M. Induction of labor in breech presentations at term: a retrospective observational study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016; 293(3): 549 - 55.

53. Burgos J., Arana I., Garitano I., 00000013.wmz L., Cobos P., Osuna C., et al. Induction of labor in breech presentation at term: a retrospective cohort study. J Perinat Med. 2017; 45(3): 299 - 303.

54. Чернуха Е.А., Пучко Т.К. Тазовое предлежание плода - М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа. 2007. - 176 с.

55. Баскетт Т.Ф., Калдер Э.А., Арулкумаран С. Оперативное акушерство Манро Керра; под ред. Р. Элсивера, - М., 2015. - С. 199 - 214.

56. Kayem G., Baumann R., Goffinet F., El Abiad S., Ville Y., Cabrol D., et al. Early preterm breech delivery: is a policy of planned vaginal delivery associated with increased risk of neonatal death? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 198(3): 289. e1 - 6.

57. Penn Z.J., Steer P.J., Grant A. A multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing elective and selective caesarean section for the delivery of the preterm breech infant. BJOG. 2014; 121 Suppl: 48 - 53.

58. Hofmeyr G.J., Kulier R. Cephalic version by postural management for breech presentation. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2012; 10: CD000051.

59. Goffinet F., Azria E., Kayem G., Schmitz T., Deneux-Tharaux C. Re: The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta-analysis including observational studies: Let's avoid simplistic radicalism when reality is complex. BJOG. 2016; 123(1): 145 - 7.

60. Su M., McLeod L., Ross S., Willan A., Hannah W.J., Hutton E., et al. Factors associated with adverse perinatal outcome in the Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 189(3): 740 - 5.

61. Smith G.C. Life-table analysis of the risk of perinatal death at term and post term in singleton pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184(3): 489 - 96.

62. Hellsten C., Lindqvist P.G., Olofsson P. Vaginal breech delivery: is it still an option? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003; 111(2): 122 - 8.

63. Vistad I., Cvancarova M., Hustad B.L., Henriksen T. Vaginal breech delivery: results of a prospective registration study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013; 13: 153.

64. Toivonen E., 00000014.wmz O., Huhtala H., Uotila J. Selective vaginal breech delivery at term - still an option. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012; 91(10): 1177 - 83.

65. Doyle N.M., Riggs J.W., Ramin S.M., Sosa M.A., Gilstrap L.C. Outcomes of term vaginal breech delivery. Am J Perinatol. 2005; 22(6): 325 - 8.

66. Borbolla Foster A., Bagust A., Bisits A., Holland M., Welsh A. Lessons to be learnt in managing the breech presentation at term: an 11-year single-centre retrospective study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014; 54(4): 333 - 9.

67. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Birth after Previous Caesarean Birth (Green-top Guideline No. 45). October 2015.

68. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Choosing to have a Caesarean Section. July 2015.

69. Vlemmix F., Bergenhenegouwen L., Schaaf J.M., Ensing S., Rosman A.N., Ravelli A.C.J., et al. Term breech deliveries in the Netherlands: did the increased cesarean rate affect neonatal outcome? A population-based cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014; 93(9): 888 - 96.

70. Berhan Y., Haileamlak A. The risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta-analysis including observational studies. BJOG. 2016; 123(1): 49 - 57.

71. Pasupathy D., Wood A.M., Pell J.P., Fleming M., Smith G.C.S. Time trend in the risk of delivery-related perinatal and neonatal death associated with breech presentation at term. Int J Epidemiol. 2009; 38(2): 490 - 8.

72. Hannah M., Whyte H., Hannah W. Maternal outcomes at 2 years post partum in the term breech trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 189(6): S136.

73. Rietberg C.C.T., Elferink-Stinkens P.M., Visser G.H.A. The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in The Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants. BJOG. 2005; 112(2): 205 - 9.

74. Lawson G.W. The term breech trial ten years on: primum non nocere? Birth. 2012; 39(1): 3 - 9.

75. Molkenboer J.F.M., Roumen F.J.M.E., Smits L.J.M., Nijhuis J.G. Birth weight and neurodevelopmental outcome of children at 2 years of age after planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194(3): 624 - 9.

76. Petersen R.W. Vaginal delivery: An argument against requiring consent. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018; 58(6): 704 - 6.